Definition: Which was [the son] of Melea, which was [the son] of Menan, which was [the son] of Mattatha, which was [the son] of Nathan, which was [the son] of David,

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this Bible verse: “Luke 3:31 Which was [the son] of Melea, which was [the son] of Menan, which was [the son] of Mattatha, which was [the son] of David.” Basically, it's a very important and unique birth record! Here’s what it means in simpler terms: “Which was [the son] of Melea…” – This refers to a baby named Melea. “…which was [the son] of Menan…” – This means Melea had a brother named Menan. “…which was [the son] of Mattatha…” – This tells us that Menan’s son, Menant, also had a son named Mattatha. “…which was [the son] of David…” – This is the big one! It means Melea and Menant were both descendants of King David. So, to put it all together: This verse describes a unique birth – a baby named Melea who is a descendant of King David through his two sons, Menan and Mattatha. Why is this significant? This was a very important event in the Old Testament because it established a direct line of succession to the kings of Israel, including King David himself. It's a foundational story about God’s covenant with Abraham and the lineage of his descendants. --- Do you want me to: Explain why this verse is important? Give you a little more context about the biblical family tree?